What
it means to your business.
Every
year about 415,000 people die from Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA). According
to the American Red Cross, SCA claims another victim every minute
of every day. A heart attack occurs when the arteries that supply
blood to the heart become blocked. The flow of blood that carries
oxygen to the heart is slowed or stopped. This is called sudden cardiac arrest or simply cardiac arrest.
Most cardiac arrests are caused by an abnormal heart rhythm called
Ventricular Fibrillation (VF). VF occurs when the heart’s electrical
system malfunctions, causing a chaotic rhythm that prevents the heart
from pumping oxygen to the victim’s brain and body.
In all cases of VF the patient will not be breathing nor will
there be a palpable pulse or heartbeat. The patient will be
unconscious, pale, or even cyanotic (bluish skin color).
Defibrillation is the only known therapy for
VF.
Help needs to be given quickly—generally before the victim even gets
to the hospital. Because VF is the primary cause, prompt resuscitation
and prevention of recurrence of VF are necessary.
Defibrillation can increase survival rates dramatically if administered
within the first few minutes.
With every minute a victim does not receive defibrillation following
sudden cardiac arrest, the chances of survival decrease by 10 percent. Statistics also show that early CPR and
early defibrillation combined with early advanced care can result
in long-term survival rates for witnessed VF, as high as 40 percent.
Installing
Automatic External Defibrillators (AEDs) in the workplace can be a wise investment and responsible
choice for the health and safety of the company’s employees, customers
and visitors.
This article will attempt to explain why AEDs
should be included in company’s first aid kits. I will also discuss
the benefits, in addition to the legal concerns of AEDs
in the workplace. Lastly I will give some resourceful information
on starting an AED program for a company’s emergency management program.
Benefits
of AEDs in the Workplace
In this
section I will discuss the benefits of having AEDs in the workplace. What are the benefits? Are there any?
Or is it wise just to wait for professional medical assistance or
to start lifesaving skills immediately? These are some of the questions
that arise when companies or organizations weigh the pros and cons
prior to starting an AED program. In addition there will be a short
discussion on the risk factors of AEDs in the civilian workplace.
All employees
are valuable to a company’s success. Government or civilian employers
depend on their people daily to keep it running smoothly and efficiently.
Depending on the company’s mission and location, you may see various
medical emergencies that may occur. Some may include bites (human,
animal, insect, etc), stings, falls, electrocution, diabetic emergencies,
motor vehicle accidents, chest pain, blunt trauma, and violent criminal
acts resulting in injury. All of these emergencies have one thing
in common—a person can go into sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) from each
of these. Once a person goes into SCA, help needs to be given quickly—generally
before the victim even arrives at the hospital. Because VF is the
primary cause of sudden cardiac arrest, prompt resuscitation and prevention
of recurrence of VF are necessary. Defibrillation can increase survival
rates dramatically if administered within the first few minutes.
To further give a better perspective of VF,
think of the heart wiggling “like a bag of prepared Jell-O”. It is
a chaotic flutter. A fibrillating heart can’t pump blood, creating
the risk of brain damage and death. Thus an electrical shock restores
a heartbeat and circulation. But for the patient to survive neurologically
intact, rescue must be swift.
AEDs
are lifesavers. The benefits of AEDs are
numerous. However in the early 1990’s AEDs were heavy, awkward to handle and maintenance-intensive.
Also the early AEDs were not as reliable
or easy to use. These factors made them impractical for many groups
of emergency responders and limited their widespread deployment. However in 1994, the
American Heart Association challenged the medical device industry
to develop a lightweight, low-cost, easy-to-use AED. Many companies rose to the challenge. Today there are
many excellent AEDs that are very easy to
use, small and lightweight. Also today's AEDs
are virtually maintenance free, durable and most of all they are highly
reliable if used properly.
Current models have automated voice prompts and computerized analysis
of the victim’s heart condition that directs the decision to shock. These improvements make it possible for
non-medical professionals to administer the same vital service without
risking an accidental shock.
Historically, only trained medical professionals (Emergency Medical
Technicians, Paramedics, and Nurses) were able to interpret the heart
rhythm on manual defibrillator devices. However AEDs
now eliminate the need for manual defibrillators for patients in sudden
cardiac arrest.
A broad
range of responders, including police officers, security guards, corporate
safety officers, flight attendants and other citizens have all reported
using AEDs successfully. Today the new generation of AEDs are reliable,
low-cost and easy to use. This makes treatment of SCA in the workplace
a realistic goal. Non-medical operators of AEDs
do not have to know how to diagnose cardiac arrhythmias. All commands
or instructions to the rescuer are computer voice prompted in the
English language. AEDs have proven to be exceptionally safe and effective.
Successful
companies with such programs already include Boeing, General Motors,
General Mills, Dow Chemical Company, IBM, Honda of America, Gillette,
Lucent Technologies, Home Depot, Smith Barney and many more. The general public
may have even seen AEDs in place on walls
at their local airport. In fact, two years ago Congress passed into
law requiring that all Federal buildings and Post Offices to have
an AED program and have AEDs easily accessible in the workplace.
AEDs
potentially prevent thousands of unnecessary deaths and allow persons
to return to full and active lives, including employment. Survivors
have a good long-term prognosis — 83% are alive at one year and 57%
at five years.
Companies
that adopt AED programs for their workplace can save lives, improve
morale, avoid potentially costly lawsuits, jury awards and demonstrate
to their workers, their clients and their communities that they care
about the health and well-being of their employees. However there are risks with the use
of AEDs in the workplace. The potential
for legal action is ever present. Initial training, upkeep and refresher
training are a major concern. The next section will examine this issue
and possibly mitigate any concern that a company may have prior to
starting their own program.
Risk
Factors of having AEDs in the Workplace
As with anything there are risk factors. This
holds true with the use of AEDs in the workplace.
There are some areas that need to be addressed before a company decides
to purchase AEDs and start an AED program
in conjunction with their First Aid program.
For $2000,
an AED can be a lifesaver for the patient; however a company that
fails to keep their employees trained or certified in the use of CPR
and AED operations can face potential legal ramifications. This can
spell doom for a company. Even a company that fails to provide CPR
and AEDs for their employees can also face possible legal action.
Either way you look at it a company can face legal issues. However
there are ways to protect your self in event of a lawsuit. This is
called prevention. By having an AED program a company can prevent
being liable for negligence. A company that already has an AED program
in place can prevent being liable for malpractice lawsuits by having
an adequate and documented training program with physician oversight.
If the
agencies’ employees are not prepared or well trained to handle cardiac
arrest emergencies, their coworkers could be left untreated until
an ambulance arrives, causing the victim’s condition to worsen. Even causing brain damage or death. This can lead to higher
medical/worker’s compensation costs and lost productivity. Currently many Emergency
Medical Services (EMS) around the nation endorses AED programs
for the workplace. The faster you can get treatment to a patient in
SCA, the better chances the patient will survive. However the company
has to have a good quality training program for their employees prior
to them performing AED operations on a patient in SCA.
The Occupational
Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) require that employers provide first
aid and CPR training to employees in the absence of a nearby clinic
or hospital.
There is not a specific number of how many employees that need to
be trained on staff, it depends on your organizations size, type of
operations and potential for emergency medical needs. At a minimum,
each department or location should have a first responder available
on each shift.
Adequate
CPR and AED training courses with required refresher training are
essential to a company’s successful emergency management plan. Employees
or companies that are reluctant to start such programs because of
liability issues such as malpractice or negligence should have little
to fear.
Currently there are over 36 states that protect persons and companies
from civil lawsuits. Good Samaritan Laws and legal principles such
as sovereign immunity are designed to protect people performing their
authorized duties. Although these laws
vary from state to state, authorized employees performing defibrillation
to people experiencing sudden cardiac arrest in the workplace setting
would generally be covered under these statutes. Even companies that
offer AEDs to their employees can be protected from legal litigation
in event of a lawsuit, just as long there is sufficient evidence of
the following recommendations set by the American Heart Association:
· Training was designated to rescuers to perform
CPR and use an AED.
· Having physician oversight to help ensure
quality control.
· Integrating with the local emergency medical
services (EMS) system Using and maintaining AEDs according to the manufacturer’s specifications.
These
recommendations of course will not prevent a lawsuit; however, they
may prevent a company from losing a lawsuit! Moreover, companies that
fail to provide CPR and AED operations in the workplace could face
stiffer consequences from the legal system. The absence of an AED
program may present a favorable advantage to the plaintiff’s attorneys,
who can argue that the deceased would most likely have survived the
SCA had the company utilized an AED. Considering the ready availability
of improved AED technology, with reduced cost and simplified operation
and maintenance, as well as the proven efficiency of timely defibrillation,
these arguments may be difficult to successfully counter in a court
of law. In 1996, a popular amusement park was found negligent
and forced to pay $500,000 in damages for failing to provide their
employees with proper emergency medical care training and for not
maintaining a defibrillator and other necessary emergency medical
equipment. In one other case, a popular airline
carrier was also found negligent for failing to provide timely treatment
for a patient suffering a cardiac arrest.
As mentioned
before, lawsuits are unpreventable however winning a lawsuit is what
really matters. If a company can cover all their bases when providing
emergency medical services such as CPR and AED operations and proper
training programs, winning a potential lawsuit is much greater then
a company that does not offer such services.